Criminal Compliance & Criminal-Civil Intersection

Service Range

• Criminal compliance before the fact: Providing general compliance business consulting for enterprises or senior executives who have no obvious criminal legal risks, conducting compliance training, finding legal loopholes in the articles of association of enterprises, and discovering legal risks in the business or trading behavior of enterprises.

• Criminal compliance at the fact: In cases where companies, executives and employees are already facing significant criminal legal risks, lawyers at Joint-Win Partners provide targeted services to prevent or avoid legal risks.

• Criminal compliance after the fact: In cases where companies, executives and employees have been investigated or even compulsory measures have been taken by the investigation authorities, lawyers at Joint-Win Partners provide compliance services for companies, executives, and employees in response to the investigation by the investigation authorities.

Typical Cases

• A logistics company was suspected of obstructing the prevention and control of infectious diseases. Joint-Win Partners helped the company achieve good results by comprehensively applying criminal charges, civil litigation and non-litigation means.

• Joint-Win Partners secured a criminal non-prosecution in a financing trade dispute between a supply chain company and a logistics company.

• Joint-Win Partners acted for a Tianjin-based private fund management company in 7 arbitration cases for fund management disputes and got support from the Arbitration Commission.

• Joint-Win Partners acted for a catering management company in the dispute over equity investment. In that case, the so-called equity transfer was actually equity investment. As a large number of people were involved, the company was reported for illegal financing. Joint-Win Partners’ lawyers fully combined criminal and civil methods to obtain satisfactory results for the client.

• Joint-Win Partners acted for a taxi management company in the dispute over infringement of the interests of minority shareholders. The case involved the reform of joint-stock cooperative enterprise, the action for shareholder qualification confirmation, the action for shareholder's right to know and the action for shareholder's interest distribution, and the actual controller was suspected of duty embezzlement. Joint-Win Partners secured a criminal non-prosecution for the client.